Case control analyses

[meninonas]

Dr. Yoo,

With the Bene analyzes, I started running them with MasterFile-r99percent-sortedPAM50-basal-vs-her-banjo.xlsx. Nevertheless, I'm running into the same issue as I did before, where the bene analyzes that I ran on path-two and path-three came out with a variables that had no parents nor children. Please see the results below. This was after I accessed path-two and path-three through Terminal, as you instructed on Monday.

[meninonas]

Dr. Yoo,

Please find the results for the bene analysis for the 25 variable datasets for MasterFile-r99percent-sortedPAM50-basal-vs-her-banjo.xlsx.

[meninonas]

Dr. Yoo,

Please find the separated files below. I was unsure if had to separate the Normal-like, since you had mentioned that they were very few.

Please let me know if you need anything else.

[meninonas]

Dr. Yoo,

Please find the Banjo results for MasterFile-r99percent-sortedPAM50-basal-vs-her-banjo.csv. Please see the log normalization scores below.

Code: Select all

Total score -79163.9756
Log score -79163.9756 is 100 % of total score
Total score -79163.9756
Log score -79212.4905 is 8.51621544767315e-20 % of total score
Total score -79163.9756
Log score -79251.1777 is 1.34464970099987e-36 % of total score

According to the results, the first score is 8.51621544767315e20 than the next best score.

[meninonas]

Dr. Yoo,

Please find the banjo results for MasterFile-r99percent-sortedPAM50-banjo.csv.

Code: Select all

Total score -257966.0947
Log score -258024.1616 is 6.05153777747448e-24 % of total score
Total score -257966.0947
Log score -258090.3673 is 1.06929015486366e-52 % of total score
Total score -257966.0947
Log score -257966.0947 is 100 % of total score

As seen in the log normalization below, this network was 1.06929015486366e52 times better than the second best network.

[meninonas]

Dr. Yoo,

Please find the results for the MasterFile-r99percent-sortedPAM50-basal-banjo.csv dataset. I ran log normalization and got the following:

Code: Select all

Total score -47675.6536999998
Log score -47675.6537 is 99.9999999825377 % of total score
Total score -47675.6536999998
Log score -47698.1391 is 1.71678083525188e-08 % of total score
Total score -47675.6536999998
Log score -47725.0014 is 3.70310643968955e-20 % of total score

As seen in the log normalization above, this network was 3.70310643968955e20 times better than the second best network.

[meninonas]

Dr. Yoo,

Please find the results for the MasterFile-r99percent-sortedPAM50-luminaA-banjo.csv dataset. As seen below, the normalized log scores are:

Code: Select all

Total score -106886.4642
Log score -106978.1801 is 1.47329843393458e-38 % of total score
Total score -106886.4642
Log score -106886.4642 is 100 % of total score
Total score -106886.4642
Log score -107011.1473 is 7.09279950115717e-53 % of total score

As seen in the log normalization above, this network was 7.09279950115717e53 times better than the second best network.

[meninonas]

Professor,

Please find the Banjo Results for the MasterFile-r99percent-sortedPAM50-basal-vs-luminaB-banjo file. Please see the log normalization scores below.

Code: Select all

Total score -62657.6445993648
Log score -62671.9139 is 6.35216065554921e-05 % of total score
Total score -62657.6445993648
Log score -62657.6446 is 99.9999364787274 % of total score
Total score -62657.6445993648
Log score -62687.2858 is 1.33964623276963e-11 % of total score

According to the results, the first score is 6.35216065554921e05 than the next best score.

[meninonas]

Dr. Yoo,

Please find the results for the bene analysis for the 25 variable datasets for MasterFile-r99percent-sortedPAM50-basal-vs-luminaB-banjo.xlsx.